USPTO serial 98356543
LUCY TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUCY TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harmony Oswald
117 Bernal Rd, Ste 70-179San Jose, CA 95119United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing information in the field of finance via a website; Providing information, commentary and advice in the field of finance, financial investments and financial valuations; Providing on-line news in the field of finance | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2022 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for business process information and management.; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for legal information.; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for finance information and management.; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for business process information and management.; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for legal information.; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for finance information and management.; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for business process information and management.; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for legal information.; Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by others for finance information and management.; Technology consultation in the field of artificial intelligence; Providing a secure electronic online system featuring technology which allows business process information and management.; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to manage business processes.; Research and development of technology in the field of legal.; Research and development of technology in the field of finance.; Research and development of technology in the field of business.; Research in the field of artificial intelligence technology | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |