Drawing for CONVENIENCE WITHOUT COMPROMISE

USPTO serial 98362143

CONVENIENCE WITHOUT COMPROMISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ELLIOTT, LASHAWNDA E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CONVENIENCE WITHOUT COMPROMISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert P. Ziemian

Robert P. Ziemian Haynes and Boone, LLP2801 N. Harwood St., Suite 2300Haynes and Boone, LLP - IP SectionDallas, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Baby food; toddler and infant formulas; dietary beverage supplements for human consumption in dry mix form for nutrition; nutritional supplements in the form of gummies; nutritional supplement barACTIVE—
029Purees including meat, meal purees including meat, purees including meat and vegetables; purees including meat in a pouch, meal purees in a pouch, purees including meat and vegetables in a pouch; fruit-based snacks; fruit-based snack food; fruit purees; fruit and vegetable purees; Fruit compotes; Fruit and vegetable compotes; Preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; fruit and vegetable jellies; Broth; Broth concentrates; broth based beverages; broth and vegetable juice-based gummy containing collagen; nut based snack bars; seed based snack bars; fruit based snack bars; nut and seed-based snack foods; snack foods in the form of puffs, namely, grain-free puffed snacks and vegetable-based puffed snacksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 5, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 21, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance