Drawing for EMBEDDINGS-BASED ACCESS CONTROL

USPTO serial 98364230

EMBEDDINGS-BASED ACCESS CONTROL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEAN, JULES J.
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with EMBEDDINGS-BASED ACCESS CONTROL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward J. Radlo

Edward J. Radlo Radlo & Su28040 Elena RoadLos Altos Hills, CA 94022United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer programming services for data processing; Cybersecurity services in the nature of restricting unauthorized access to computer systems for organizations who want to protect their information in artificial intelligence systems and vector databases; Consulting services for others in the field of design, planning, and implementation project management of artificial intelligence systems and vector databasesACTIVEDec 31, 2023

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 10, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2025CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2025SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 23, 2025AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 16, 2025IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 16, 2025EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 19, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 24, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2024ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 4, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 2024XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 21, 2024GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2024GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2024CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 14, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 17, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance