USPTO serial 98367993
ELECTRIFIEDGRID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSEN, BENJAMIN H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELECTRIFIEDGRID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R Menker
James R Menker Holley & Menker, PAPO Box 331937Atlantic Beach, FL 32233United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for data analysis and system modeling based on performance, power and cost | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management; business operation management services, business consulting and advisory services for retail, manufacturing, distribution, service and engineering businesses; business management and enterprise organization consultancy for government and public sector enterprises; business risk management | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial planning, consulting and management services; financial risk management services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services relating to computer software; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting computer software problems; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with computer hardware and computer servers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 11, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |