Drawing for CURIO

USPTO serial 98368422

CURIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FITZSIMONS, MICHAEL R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CURIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine P. Califa

Katherine P. Califa Foley & Lardner LLP3000 K Street, N.W.Sixth FloorWashington, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for generating, adding, editing, analyzing, processing, locating, reporting and managing metadata using artificial intelligence and machine-learning; Downloadable computer software for use in managing and analyzing data and content for users; Downloadable computer software for generating, editing, analyzing, processing, locating, reporting, and managing metadataACTIVE—
042Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for generating, adding, editing, analyzing, processing, locating, reporting and managing metadata using artificial intelligence and machine-learning; platform as a Service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for use in managing and analyzing data and content for users; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for generating, editing, analyzing, processing, locating, reporting, and managing metadataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 6, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 5, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 4, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 22, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance