Drawing for WE GO BEYOND

USPTO serial 98369175

WE GO BEYOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
INNES,ISABEL J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE GO BEYOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter C. Stomma

Peter C. Stomma Boyle Fredricson SC840 No. Plankinton AveMilwaukee, WI 53203United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Sawmills; Tree stump cutters; Power operated tree stump grinders; Firewood processors, namely, power-operated machines for cutting and splitting firewood; Power operated wood chippers; Machines for splitting logs for firewoodACTIVE—
012Trailers, namely, sawmill trailers, off-road trailers, cargo trailers, utility trailers, dump trailers, and trailers for use with ATVs; Log arches for use in transporting logsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 26, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 8, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 17, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 11, 2025ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2025GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2025GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2025CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 8, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 6, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 14, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 21, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance