USPTO serial 98369762
CANTOMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RYDLAND, STEPHANIE DIANA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANTOMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Anaheim Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sunil A Brahmbhatt
Sunil A Brahmbhatt Law Office of Sunil A. Brahmbhatt PLC.155 N. Riverview Drive, Suite #220Anaheim Hills, CA 92808United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable cloud-based software for cloud-based software for laboratory information management; chain of custody tracking; laboratory workflow management, reporting, laboratory equipment and assets tracking, and laboratory testing results tracking; analytical laboratory software; regulatory compliance; customer order tracking and license tracking. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable web-based decentralized applications (DApps) for categories of cloud-based software for laboratory information management; chain of custody tracking; laboratory workflow management, reporting, laboratory equipment and assets tracking, and laboratory testing results tracking; analytical laboratory software; regulatory compliance; customer order tracking and license tracking. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2025 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 27, 2025 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2025 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |