USPTO serial 98374240
ORIGIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 643
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAINES, LEAH R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORIGIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Indianapolis, IN, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Kosc
Jeffrey Kosc Taft Stettinius & HollisterOne Indiana Square, Suite 3500Indianapolis, IN 46204United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Information technology consultation, implementation and ongoing maintenance relating to data analytics, artificial intelligence, and business process automation; Computer data analysis, data management and migration services, namely, design, implementation, and maintenance of information technology infrastructure for others in the field of strategy, business intelligence, analytics, business process automation, robotic process automation, application development and integration, including data transfer, data analytics, data quality and governance, and data optimization; computer software implementation services consisting of software selection and implementation; Consultation and implementation, namely, data architecture, data engineering and data platform migration;Consultation and implementation services, namely, analytics consulting services; Consultation and implementation services, namely, business services relating to artificial intelligence, user-centered design and data visualization; Consultation and implementation services, namely, technology services relating to artificial intelligence, user-centered design, and data visualization; computer sofware consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer software systems for others; Design and development of computer software; Design and development of on-line computer software systems; Computer software consultation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 30, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 3, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 16, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |