USPTO serial 98376219
ROLLEEZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIRCHGASSER, ROSS LEONARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROLLEEZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Damon Ashcraft
J. Damon Ashcraft SNELL & WILMER, L.L.P.One East Washington Street, Suite 2700Phoenix, AZ 85004-2556UNITED STATES OF AMERICAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared side dishes consisting primarily of vegetables; Prepared side dishes consisting primarily of processed chickpeas; Prepared side dishes consisting primarily of processed chickpeas and processed lentils; Prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, processed chickpeas, processed lentils, and cooked vegetables; Prepared food kits composed of meat, processed chickpeas, processed lentils, and cooked vegetables, ready for cooking and assembly as a meal; Seasoned vegetables; Processed fruit; Prepared side dishes consisting primarily of processed beans; Prepared meals consisting primarily of processed beans | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Prepared side dishes consisting primarily of processed quinoa; Prepared side dishes consisting primarily of cooked, processed grains, namely, wheat grain, barley, oats, and rice; Prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta, processed barley, rice, and processed quinoa; Prepared food kits comprised primarily of pasta, processed barley, rice, processed quinoa, and processed beans ready for cooking and assembly as a meal; Pasta sauce; Pasta sauces, namely, frozen pasta sauces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 25, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 26, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 26, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |