USPTO serial 98377163
AZIMA DLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 748
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOLD, BARBARA NIELSEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AZIMA DLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caldwell A. Camero
Caldwell A. Camero Fluke Corporation6920 Seaway Blvd.Everett, WA 98203United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for remote interactive monitoring, diagnostic, and reporting for the remote monitoring of industrial, power, and other continuous process plant operations in the field of condition-based maintenance, performance, and reliability optimization for use in predictive maintenance of industrial machinery; Downloadable computer software that allows users to remotely view, monitor, and assess industrial, power, and other continuous process plant operations for use in predictive maintenance of industrial machinery | ACTIVE | Jan 30, 2009 |
| 042 | Software as a service (SaaS) services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for use in remote interactive computer system monitoring, computer diagnostic, and reporting of machine vibration and equipment condition services for remotely monitoring industrial, power, and other continuous process plant operations in the field of condition-based maintenance, performance, and reliability optimization for industrial, power and other continuous process plants; Software as a service (SaaS) services, namely, providing temporary use of a non-downloadable online system management services that allow users to remotely view, monitor, and assess industrial, power and other continuous process plant operations; Software as a service (SaaS) services, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable software that allows users to remotely view, monitor, and assess industrial, power, and other continuous process plant operations; Engineering services, namely, engineering in the field of vibration data analysis, and diagnostic services for use in predictive maintenance of industrial machinery; Technical services, namely, remote interactive computer system monitoring, computer diagnostic, and reporting of machinery vibration analysis and predictive maintenance data services of industrial, power, and other continuous process plant operation in the field of condition-based maintenance, performance, and reliability optimization for industrial, power and other continuous process plants; Online system management services, namely, providing temporary use of a non-downloadable online software that allows users to remotely view, monitor, and assess industrial, power, and other continuous process plant operations | ACTIVE | Jan 30, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2025 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 18, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 24, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2024 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2024 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2024 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2024 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 23, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2024 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |