USPTO serial 98377307
EXQUISITE CORPSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AVENT, TEAGUE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXQUISITE CORPSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charlottesville, VA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J. SULLIVAN
Christopher J. Sullivan Ritter Law PLLC240 W Main St, Suite 100, CW125Charlottesville, VA 22902United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Card-based party games; playing cards, namely, cards used as accessories for party games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2026 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2026 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 10, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |