Drawing for MINDX AI

USPTO serial 98381188

MINDX AI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
URBAN,HENRY J
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINDX AI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Abe J. Shanehsaz

Abe J. Shanehsaz Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP300 N. Meridian Street, Suite 2500Indianapolis, IN 46204United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer and mobile application software using artificial intelligence for performing psychiatric assessments and for the diagnosis and treatment of various psychiatric conditions; Downloadable computer and mobile application software using artificial intelligence for tracking mental health, to identify mental health conditions, track the same over time, recommend treatments, and assess risks and prevent self-harm in relation to the sameACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring artificial intelligence software for performing psychiatric assessments, namely, for the diagnosis and treatment of various psychiatric conditions; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for collecting, integrating, assessing, and reporting on health-related information, data and test results, psychiatric information, data and test results, and mental health information, data and test resultsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2026MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2026ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2026EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2026EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2026EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 13, 2026EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 16, 2025NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 10, 2025ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 30, 2025ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2024XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Nov 26, 2024XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance