Drawing for OMAHA

USPTO serial 98384895

OMAHA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOPENSKI, CLAUDIA ANN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OMAHA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Niria M. Arvizu

Niria M. Arvizu Law Offices of Niria M. Arvizu301 E. Colorado Blvd.Suite 705Pasadena, CA 91101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, except beersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 5, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 9, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 8, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 8, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2025ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Oct 8, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2025PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2025PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2025ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2025PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Aug 28, 2025APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
May 7, 2025PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 7, 2025TPDRTEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2024MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 22, 2024ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 8, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 8, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance