CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for TEKNOWLEDGE

USPTO serial 98384996

TEKNOWLEDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PHILLIPS, ALEXANDER J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEKNOWLEDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARK H. TIDMAN

Mark H. Tidman Baker & Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Ave, NWWashington Square, Suite 1100Washington, DC 20036-5403

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising marketing and promotional services; Providing office functions; Personnel recruitment services; database management; employment agency services, talent sourcing and scouting services being employment recruiting services; Outsourcing services in the nature of arranging service contracts for others; outsourcing of technical talent, namely, arranging service contracts for others in the field of technical support; outsourcing of technical staff namely, arranging service contracts for others in the field of technical support; insourcing and outsourcing of personnel, namely, personnel placement and management; consultancy relating to in-sourcing and outsourcing, namely, consulting services relating to personnel placement and management; human resource management services and personnel recruitment services; human capital management outsourcing services, namely, arranging service contracts for others in the field of human capital management; personnel consultancy; data processing consultancy; administrative data processing; electronic data processing; computer database management, namely in relation to computer security; computer data processing, namely in relation to computer security; business information services provided on-line from a global computer network or the internetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 22, 2026MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 6, 2026ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 6, 2026EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 23, 2025EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 9, 2025GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2025GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2025CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2025ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2025EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 7, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 7, 2025EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 21, 2025DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 16, 2025AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 21, 2025DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2025ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2025XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Apr 4, 2025XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 7, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 29, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance