USPTO serial 98392268
BETTER HAIRCARE, MINDFULLY MADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHMIELARSKI, ANDREW J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BETTER HAIRCARE, MINDFULLY MADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brooklyn, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. English
Robert J. English Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.114 West 47th StreetNew York, NY 10036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, NON-MEDICATED HAIR SERUM, HAIR MASKS, HAIR CREAM, HAIR OILS, NON-MEDICATED HAIR MOISTURIZER, SHAMPOOS FOR HAIR, HAIR CONDITIONER, HAIR STYLING SPRAY, AND HAIR SPRAY, NAMELY, HAIR PROTECTIVE SPRAY; DRY SHAMPOO; DRY HAIR CONDITIONER; HAIR STYLING POWDER BEING HAIR-WASHING POWDER; STYLING FOAM FOR HAIR; HAIR SPRAY, NAMELY, HAIR THICKENING SPRAY | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | ELECTRIC HAIR STYLERS, NAMELY, ELECTRIC HAIR STYLING IRONS, ELECTRIC FLAT IRONS, ELECTRIC HAIR STRAIGHTENING IRONS, ELECTRIC HAIR CURLING IRONS; ACCESSORIES FOR ELECTRIC HAIR STYLERS, NAMELY, CASES AND HOLDERS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HOLDING OR CARRYING ELECTRIC HAIR STYLING IRONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | HAIR DRYERS; ELECTRIC HAIR DRYERS; HAND-HELD ELECTRIC HAIR DRYERS; TRAVEL HAIR DRYERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | HAIR BRUSHES; ELECTRICALLY-HEATED HAIR BRUSHES; ELECTRIC HOT BRUSHES; ELECTRIC ROTARY HAIR BRUSH FOR STYLING A USER'S HAIR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 4, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 20, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |