Drawing for COHESION

USPTO serial 98395490

COHESION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RENNIE, GABRIELLE M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COHESION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Megan E. Spitz

Megan E. Spitz Blank Rome LLPOne Logan Square, 8th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Amplifiers; Audio speakers; Data processors; Digital sound processors; Loud speakersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 30, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 29, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 4, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 3, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 4, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2024MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance