USPTO serial 98402243
COBBLESTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, JAYLEN SYLVIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 132
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COBBLESTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAJESH FOTEDAR
RAJESH FOTEDAR COGNITION IP P.C.50 CALIFORNIA ST.1500SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for notifying landlords of fraudulent information in a potential tenant's rental application; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for notifying landlords of fraudulent information in a potential tenant's rental application | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 16, 2025 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 2, 2025 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2025 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |