USPTO serial 98409174
ARTEMIS TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCHRADER, BRITTANY A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARTEMIS TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Lyon
John L. Lyon Thomas Horstemeyer, LLP3200 Windy Hill Road SE; Suite 1600EAtlanta, GA 30339United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Actuating mechanisms being servomotors and non-electrical mechanical actuators for controlling rudders; Actuating mechanisms being servomotors and non-electrical mechanical actuators for operating rudders; Propulsion mechanisms, other than for land vehicles in the nature of electric motors; Electric propulsion mechanisms being electric motors for machines; Electric propulsion mechanisms being electric motors for water vehicles; Marine propulsion units, namely, motors and engines for zero or low-emission propulsion boats and ships | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Hydrofoils for ships; Hydrofoils for boats; Hydrofoils being boats | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Machinery retrofit and conversion services; Shipbuilding; Custom shipbuilding; Naval shipbuilding; Providing information relating to shipbuilding | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Arranging ferry transportation; Boat transport; Boat transportation; Boat transportation services; Marine transport; Marine transport services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design services in the field of naval shipbuilding; Marine vehicle design; Ship design | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Artemis Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ARTEMIS TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 24, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |