Drawing for CLOUD BAS ECOSYSTEM

USPTO serial 98425350

CLOUD BAS ECOSYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 762
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOLLENKARK, RHONNA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLOUD BAS ECOSYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH R. FALCON III

JOSEPH R. FALCON III BARLEY SNYDER2 GREAT VALLEY PARKWAYSUITE 110MALVERN, PA 19355

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation, maintenance and repair of building automation equipmentACTIVE—
042Design, installation, updating and maintenance of computer software for building and facility automationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2026EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 27, 2026EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 5, 2025GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2025GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2025CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 7, 2025GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2025GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2025CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2025ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2025EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 15, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 15, 2025EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 15, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 15, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2024XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Dec 23, 2024XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 9, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance