USPTO serial 98429423
Serial No. 98429423
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HESIK, APRIL ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 98429423?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Rapids, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARL T. ONDERSMA
KARL T. ONDERSMA GARDNER, LINN, BURKHART & ONDERSMA LLP2900 CHARLEVOIX DRIVE SESUITE 300GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic sensors for detecting items conveyed on a conveyor system; reflectors for detecting items conveyed on a conveyor system | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2026 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 6, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 12, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2024 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |