Drawing for PURVEYORS OF PURR

USPTO serial 98429869

PURVEYORS OF PURR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID-BROWN, ROBIN S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURVEYORS OF PURR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas K. Richards

Thomas K. Richards Singh, Singh & Trauben LLP400 South Beverly DriveSuite 240Beverly Hills, CA 90212

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025ShirtsACTIVE—
028Pet toys containing catnipACTIVE—
031Catnip; Edible silvervine powder for pet catsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 27, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 25, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 2, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 18, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance