USPTO serial 98432912
COCINA FRESCA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COCINA FRESCA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Martinez, Esq.
Frank J. Martinez, Esq. THE MARTINEZ GROUP PLLC55 Poplar Street, Suite 1-DBrooklyn, NY 11201-6930United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cake cutters; Cheese planes, non-electric; Cheese slicers, non-electric; Chef knives; Cleavers; Dessert knives; Disposable knives; Disposable tableware, namely, knives, forks and spoons; Knife sharpeners; Mincing knives; Paring knives; Scissors for household use; Scissors for kitchen use; Serving knives; Spoons being tableware; Table cutlery, namely, forks, spoons, and knives; Table cutlery, namely, cocktail forks; Table knives, forks and spoons for babies; Cutters for wine bottle foil, hand-operated; Hand-operated apple corers; Hand-operated mandolins for cutting food; Hand-operated fruit slicers; Hand-operated vegetable corers; Manually operated french fry cutters; Non-electric pizza cutters | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Cups; Trivets; Biodegradable cups; Brushes for basting meat; Butter-dish and cheese-dish covers; Casseroles dishes; Charcuterie boards for serving and cutting charcuterie; Coffee cups, tea cups and mugs; Cookie cutters; Crockery, namely, pots, dishes, drinking cups and saucers, bowls, serving bowls and trays; Cutting boards for the kitchen; Dish cloths; Dish drying mats; Dish drying racks; Dish rags; Dishes not of precious metal; Double wall cups with lids and straws; Drinking cups for children and parts and fittings therefor, namely, drinking cups for children sold as a unit with non-insulated lids; Drinking cups sold with lids therefor; Food basters; Household utensils, namely, graters; Insulating sleeve holder for beverage cups; Knife blocks; Mixing cups; Napkin rings; Pet dishes; Pet feeding dishes; Place mats, not of paper or textile; Roasting dishes; Serving tongs; Sippy cups; Soap dishes; Soap dispensing dish brushes; Spaghetti tongs; Strainers for household purposes; Table napkin holders; Tea cups; Utensils for barbecues, namely, forks, tongs, turners; Zesters; Household utensils, namely, kitchen tongs; Household utensils, namely, spatulas; Non-electric mincers; Silicone baking cups | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 12, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |