Drawing for RED ROCK CASES CO

USPTO serial 98436489

RED ROCK CASES CO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOFFMAN, CHRISTOPHER J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 128

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with RED ROCK CASES CO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew T. Kramer

Matthew T. Kramer Weide & Miller, Ltd.10655 W Park Run Dr STE 100Las Vegas, NV 89144United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
013Carrying cases adapted for firearms; Gun and rifle casesACTIVE—
018Carrying cases; Travel casesACTIVE—
035On-line retail store services featuring carrying cases, travel cases, gun and rifle carrying cases, carrying cases adapted for firearms; Retail store services featuring carrying cases, travel cases, gun and rifle carrying cases, carrying cases adapted for firearmsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 8, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 8, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 24, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 24, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 19, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 18, 2024GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2024GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2024CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 16, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance