USPTO serial 98436608
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Deadline: 6 Dec 2026
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The examiner has identified that you need to submit a proper specimen showing your trademark clearly used as a source identifier for your services.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Benjamin D. Rotman
Benjamin D. Rotman UB Greensfelder LLP200 W. Madison St.Suite 3300 - Attn: IP DocketChicago, IL 60606| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Charge card and credit card payment processing services; clearing and reconciling financial transactions via a global computer network; Credit and cash card payment processing services; Credit card and debit card payment processing services; financial services, namely, funding online cash accounts from prepaid cash cards, bank accounts and credit card accounts; financial services, namely, providing on-line stored value accounts in an electronic environment; issuing prepaid debit cards; processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; electronic funds transfer; Processing electronic payments to load prepaid cards, namely, general purpose reloadable prepaid cards, by direct deposit, in-store cash transfers, electronic funds transfers, and card to card transfers; Processing electronic payments to load debit cards, namely, by direct deposit, in-store cash transfers, electronic funds transfers, and card to card transfers; financial transaction services involving payments to online and offline retailers, merchants and content providers using cash account information stored in a centralized database, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options; electronic funds transfer and currency transfer services; Transaction authorization and settlement services, namely, the processing and funds settlement of transactions; Financial services in the form of cash disbursement through automated teller machines, in store credit card authorization services, and providing cash; Debit card transaction processing services | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2026 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2026 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 8, 2026 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2025 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2025 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2025 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |