USPTO serial 98445005
RISE AEROTEK V
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WERT, KARL ANTHONY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RISE AEROTEK V?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hanover, MD, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherry Flax
Sherry Flax Saul Ewing LLP1001 Fleet Street9th FloorBaltimore, MD 21202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Construction, repair and maintenance of buildings; Installation, maintenance and repair of machines; Maintenance and repair of machinery; Maintenance of construction equipment; Maintenance of construction machines; Pipeline construction and maintenance; Providing information relating to the repair or maintenance of electronic machines and apparatus; Providing technical support, namely, technical advice concerning the installation, repair and maintenance of electric or electronic apparatus, equipment and devices used for automated or partly automated industrial operations; Repair and maintenance of electronic apparatus; Repair of construction machines and construction equipment; Technical consulting in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) hardware customization; Technical support services, namely, technical advice related to the repair of robotics equipment, warehouse equipment, and electronic machines; Installation, maintenance and repair of manufacturing machines and apparatus; Repair or maintenance of construction machines and apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 5, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |