Drawing for PUREMAX

USPTO serial 98445120

PUREMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 794
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DIBBLE,JENNA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PUREMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL STEINMETZ

MICHAEL STEINMETZ Garson Segal Steinmetz Fladgate LLP164 W 25th St Fl 11New York, NY 10001United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Cleaning clothsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2026GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2026GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2026CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 1, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 1, 2026JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 1, 2026EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 17, 2026GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2026GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2026CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 28, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2025GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Nov 29, 2025GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2025CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jul 10, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 16, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 11, 2025GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2025GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2025CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 25, 2025ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2025EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 25, 2025JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 25, 2025EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 6, 2024GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 6, 2024GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2024CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2024TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 14, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance