USPTO serial 98445622
APPLYSHOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SIEGEL, PAIGE JORDAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APPLYSHOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kitchener, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan Feeney
Alan Feeney PCK IP Lawyers (USA) P.C1717 Pennsylvania Avenue North WestSuite 1025Washington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software and hardware for processing payment transactions, processing point of sale transactions, namely supplying single use downloadable vouchers to purchase third party study services for abroad and providing access to suppliers and vendors for educational institutions and students to study abroad | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website featuring promotional discount vouchers, rebates, and discount information for students who apply to study-abroad programs and educational institutions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of cloud-based non-downloadable software for processing payment transactions, processing point of sale transactions, voucher redemption, supplying single use downloadable vouchers to purchase third party study services for study abroad and provide access to suppliers and vendors of products and services relating to study abroad | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 12, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 11, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 10, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2024 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |