USPTO serial 98446239
ILOVESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ILOVESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ryan S. Hilbert
Ryan S. Hilbert Holley & Menker PAPO Box 331937Atlantic Beach, FL 32233United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software; Downloadable document management software; downloadable software ; Downloadable computer software for use as an application programming interface (api); Downloadable software for processing images, graphics and text; Downloadable image recognition software; Downloadable software and applications for mobile devices ; computer software applications, downloadable; Downloadable mobile applications; Downloadable data storage computer programs; data storage devices and media; Downloadable computer software for verifying, certifying and authenticating digital and electronic signatures | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | software design and development; scientific research; design and development of computer hardware; scientific services and design relating thereto; science and technology services; industrial analysis and research services; technological services and design relating thereto; technical research; platform as a service [paas]; platform as a service [paas] featuring computer software platforms for document management; platform as a service [paas] featuring computer software platforms for use as an application programming interface (api); platform as a service [paas] featuring computer software platforms for processing images, graphics and text; platform as a service [paas] featuring computer software platforms for image recognition; platform as a service [paas] featuring computer software platforms for data storage; platform as a service [paas] featuring computer software platforms for verifying, certifying and authenticating digital and electronic signatures; software as a service [saas]; software as a service [saas] featuring computer software for document management; software as a service [saas] featuring computer software for use as an application programming interface (api); software as a service [saas] featuring computer software for processing images, graphics and text; software as a service [saas] featuring computer software for image recognition; software as a service [saas] featuring computer software for data storage; software as a service [saas] featuring computer software for verifying, certifying and authenticating digital and electronic signatures; electronic signature services namely electronic signature verification services using technology to authenticate user identity; certification of electronic signatures; data security services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |