USPTO serial 98451715
SMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNABB, SANDRA MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Englewood, CO, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Boger
John W. Boger Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti P.C.5 Columbia CircleAlbany, NY 12203United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of software for computer manipulation of patient-specific digital images for surgical planning of procedures in the foot and ankle; Design and development of customized, patient specific surgical instruments, implants for use in the realignment, fusion, and arthroplasty of bones and soft tissue in the foot and ankle; Design and development of software to upload patient-specific imaging data for developing corresponding digital models of custom instruments and implants for use in the realignment or fusion or arthroplasty of bones or soft tissue in the foot and ankle; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for graphic manipulation of patient-specific digital images for designing and developing customized, patient-specific surgical instruments and medical implants and for formulating patient specific surgical plans for use in the realignment, fusion, and arthroplasty of bones and soft tissue in the foot and ankle for digital distribution to health practitioner users. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 5, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 8, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |