Drawing for VERSAFLOW

USPTO serial 98454838

VERSAFLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FORREST, ELIZABETH P
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERSAFLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey S. Dixon

Jeffrey S. Dixon The Law Offices of Konrad Sherinian, LLC1755 Park Street Suite 200Naperville, IL 60563United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Plumbing fittings, namely tee, wye, elbow, reducing, and drain fittingsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2025PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 30, 2025PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 20, 2025APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 18, 2025PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
Apr 22, 2025PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2025APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 29, 2025PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 29, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2025PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2025PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance