USPTO serial 98457575
BLUEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NOVAKOVIC, MIROSLAV
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLUEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jae Youn Kim
Jae Youn Kim NKL Law3251 Blenheim Blvd.Suite 500Fairfax, VA 22030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Receptacles for receiving surgical instruments, namely, medical waste containers for holding, organizing, sterilizing, or disposing of surgical instruments; surgical robots; nanorobot for medical purposes, including targeted drug delivery, minimally invasive surgery, diagnostic imaging, and tissue repair; medical suturing device, specially for closing wounds, surgical incisions, or tissue repairs in various medical procedures; medical devices for spinal disc repair in the nature of spinal disc implants made from artificial substances; medical implants and prosthesis for use in bone grafting; medical implants for osteosynthesis; joint endoprostheses; joint prostheses; endoprostheses; spinal implants composed of artificial material; surgical instruments for use in orthopedic and spinal surgery; surgical instruments for use in spinal surgery; surgical instruments for use in spinal surgery; medical devices to protect the spine, specially used for injury prevention, post-surgical recovery, or chronic spinal condition management; spine protection aids for medical purposes; medical apparatus for use in non-invasive surgical procedures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 10, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 9, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 28, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |