USPTO serial 98459036
RIVET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PILARO, MARK F
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIVET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Washington, DC, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judd D. Lauter
Judd D. Lauter Cooley LLP1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700Washington, DC 20004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality headsets and helmets; motion and light sensors for use with augmented reality headsets and helmets; optical position tracking apparatus, namely, electronic devices for locating and tracking people or users in a tracked space using light, infrared, and RF technology; downloadable and recorded augmented reality software for use in mobile devices for integrating electronic data with real world environments for the purpose of viewing virtual models; downloadable and recorded optical position tracking software for tracking people for use with virtual reality glasses and headsets; surveying apparatus and instruments; downloadable and recorded augmented reality computer software for delivering duty specific frontline work instruction, diagnostics, inspection, documentation, and remote subject matter assistance to a broad array of end-user professions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of augmented reality technology; Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for augmented reality and spatial computing; software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software for augmented reality and spatial computing, specifically, for delivering duty specific frontline work instruction, diagnostics, inspection, documentation, and remote subject matter assistance to a broad array of end-user professions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 8, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |