USPTO serial 98461305
CONVERSATION GENOME PROJECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUNDAGE, DAVID WILLIAM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONVERSATION GENOME PROJECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charlene Minx
Charlene Minx Minx Law, PC401 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1200Santa Monica, CA 90401United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing telecommunications access to blockchain networks; Providing telecommunications connections to blockchain networks; Providing access to databases; Providing access to blockchain transactions databases; Provision of access for others to data on the Internet in a decentralized computing network using blockchain technology in the field of conversational intelligence | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider, namely, hosting software platforms for using blockchain technology enabled distributed problem solving, data mining, data processing, and data warehousing; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for processing and analyzing data in the field of conversational intelligence on a blockchain; Providing temporary use of a non-downloadable web-based decentralized application for processing and analyzing text, speech, voice, and other conversational data; Computer services, namely, creating an on-line community for registered users to process and tag text, speech, voice, and other conversational data with metadata, to create profiles from conversational data, to validate the work of others online, and to receive financial incentives for participation, all via a blockchain network; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for providing a blockchain infrastructure, namely, blockchain validation, blockchain node hosting, and compute workloads; Blockchain as a service (BaaS) services, in the nature of application service provider services, namely, hosting software for use by others for processing and analyzing data in the field of conversational intelligence; Platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring computer software in the nature of a platform using blockchain technology for processing and analyzing data in the field of conversational intelligence; Platform as a service (PaaS) services, namely, providing an online computer software platform using decentralized blockchain technology for electronic transfer of virtual currencies, namely, distributing digital tokens as economic incentives amongst an online community; Infrastructure as a service (IAAS) services, namely, hosting blockchain-based software for processing and analyzing data in the field of conversational intelligence for use by others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Afterparty, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Afterparty, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CONVERSATION GENOME PROJECT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2025 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2025 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 26, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2024 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2024 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2024 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |