Drawing for FRUVITA

USPTO serial 98466483

FRUVITA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PETTICAN, NATHANIEL VINCIENT
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRUVITA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nitin Kaushik

50 Lerer LaneStaten Island, NY 10307United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Telemarketing; Administration of the business affairs of franchises; Advertising by mail order; Commercial assistance in business management; Conducting marketing studies; Consumer research; Demonstration of goods and services by electronic means, also for the benefit of the so-called teleshopping and homeshopping services; Influencer marketing services; On-line advertising services for others; Operating on-line marketplaces for sellers and buyers of goods and/or services; Pay per click advertising; Product merchandising for others; Promotion of goods and services through sponsorship of sports events; Promotion of goods of others through influencers; Providing recommendations of goods to consumers for commercial purposes; Rental of vending machines; Retail store services for pharmaceutical, veterinary and sanitary preparations and medical supplies; Search engine optimisation for sales promotion; Targeted marketing services; Web site traffic optimizationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2024NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 2024NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 12, 2024PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2024NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2024CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 3, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance