Drawing for VAPI

USPTO serial 98467370

VAPI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VAPI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MANALI SHAH

MANALI SHAH LAW OFFICE OF MANALI SHAH6165 ROBERTSON AVENEWARK, CA 94560UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software development kits (SDKs) for creating artificial intelligence-powered voice agents that facilitate natural language interactions between humans and machines, excluding use in security surveillance, access control, intercoms, or video monitoring systemsABANDONED—
042Application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software exclusively for AI-driven voice and speech recognition, processing voice commands, and text-to-speech conversion, explicitly excluding applications related to security surveillance, video monitoring, access control, intercoms, or audio-visual security systemsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2026MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 9, 2026ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Feb 9, 2026OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 9, 2026OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 12, 2025OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 12, 2025OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 22, 2025LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 22, 2025LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 20, 2025LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Oct 14, 2025NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2025PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 8, 2025NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2025LOPRLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED-NO FURTHER ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 19, 2025LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Sep 11, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 11, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2025PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2025ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2025PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 29, 2025APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 28, 2025ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 28, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 28, 2025ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 26, 2025PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 29, 2025CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 8, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2025ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 26, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2025PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2025ERTPTEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED—
May 21, 2025PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 21, 2025APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 17, 2025PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2025PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 16, 2025NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2025PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 16, 2025PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2025LOPELETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED - ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 23, 2024LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Oct 5, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 26, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance