USPTO serial 98469890
SORD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SORD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ESTEBAN O'FARRELL
2125 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 206Miami, FL 33137United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices for use in treating acute ischemic stroke; Medical devices for use in treating cerebral ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI) post mechanical thrombectomy | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services; Medical treatment of acute ischemic stroke; Medical treatment of cerebral ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI) post mechanical thrombectomy; Providing information relating to the treatment of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases via the internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |