Drawing for GIORGIO FEDON

USPTO serial 98471836

GIORGIO FEDON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAVEN, PAUL S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 126

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GIORGIO FEDON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher D. Olszyk, Jr.

Christopher D. Olszyk, Jr. Fox Rothschild LLP212 Carnegie Center, Suite 400Princeton, NJ 08540United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Chains for eyeglasses; Chains for spectacles; Chains for spectacles and for sunglasses; Eye glass cases; Eye glass chains; Eyeglass chains; Eyeglass cords; Eyeglass retaining cords; Eyewear cases; Eyewear pouches; Spectacle chainsACTIVEMar 4, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 2025MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 15, 2025ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 31, 2024XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Dec 31, 2024XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 26, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 29, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2024TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Mar 29, 2024PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance