USPTO serial 98483458
SAAS APP FACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAAS APP FACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shay M. Markus
9 Massada St.Bnei Brak, 5120109IsraelGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as Service (SAAS) services featuring software for providing network security, system security, file security, email security, instant messaging security, SaaS security and data security; Application service provider, namely, hosting, managing, developing, and maintaining applications, software, and web sites, in the fields of computer security, data security and business information management based on artificial intelligence; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in threat prevention and monitoring of security threats to computers, computer systems, servers, computer networks, endpoints, mobile devices, and internet of things (IoT) enabled devices; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for the encryption and authentication of the integrity of data, digital assets, documents, and files across multiple channels; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in threat prevention and monitoring of security threats to computers, computer systems, servers, computer networks, endpoints, mobile devices, and internet of things (IoT) enabled devices; Infrastructure as a service (IAAS) services, namely, hosting servers for use by others; computer services, namely, providing databases as a service (DBaaS), namely, cloud hosting of computer databases for others; Computer services, namely, cloud hosting provider services; Computer security services, namely, enforcing, restricting and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources for cloud, mobile or network resources based on assigned credentials for computer security and data security for securing information across online computer functions, namely, email, instant messaging and file sharing and business information management; application service provider (ASP) featuring application programming interface (API) software for providing a platform for the development, testing, and integration of data security software applications; Technology consultation and research in the field of artificial intelligence; Computer security threat analysis for protecting data; Data security consultancy; Design and development of electronic data security systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |