USPTO serial 98485768
PROMPTS.AI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RENNEKER, CHRISTOPHER JOHN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROMPTS.AI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rochester, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory Bussell
Gregory Bussell Fishman Stewart PLLC800 Tower DriveSuite 610Troy, MI 48098Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Research in the field of computer natural language processing; Technical consulting in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) software customization; Providing temporary use of online non-downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence for creating artistic and illustrative works, including visual art, graphic design, digital illustrations, and multimedia compositions; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for integrating input from creative artists, illustrators, and designers to enhance instructions to be used in connection with large language models; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software using artificial intelligence for generating creative content via a large language model based on instructions, feedback, and guidelines supplied by industry experts in fields of art, design, and creative content; Providing computer programming services to customers that enables the customer's website to process natural language queries; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to refine and enhance instructions to be used in connection with large language models; Computer graphics design services, namely, sketch to image rapid prototyping; creating of 3D models; and 2D to 3D model generation; Research and development of 3D content, 3D technology and processes, stereoscopic 3D projection, 3D animation technology, 3D processing power, 3D techniques, and flexible forward projection; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for voice and audio generation. | ACTIVE | Oct 5, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jan 19, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |