USPTO serial 98488123
SOUSTATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BACZESKI, LILLIANNA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOUSTATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bellevue, WA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan Sworen
Jordan Sworen Argus Intellectual Enterprise, LLC1515 Market StreetSUITE 1200Philadelphia, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Boxes specially adapted for the storage of cutlery and flatware; table cutlery; table cutlery of precious metals; plastic disposable cutlery, namely, knives, forks and spoons; disposable tableware, namely, knives, forks and spoons; flatware being knives, forks and spoons; scissors for kitchen use; knives, forks and spoons being tableware; non-electric fruit peelers; non-electric vegetable peelers; non-electric pizza cutters; pizza slicers; table cutlery | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Basting brushes; basting spoons for kitchen use; bottle openers; bread tongs; cake servers; cheese graters; cooking forks; cooking graters; cooking spoons; graters for kitchen use; kitchen ladles, namely, gravy ladles; non-electric whisks for household purposes, namely, hand-operated whisks; ice cream scoops; kitchen ladles; scrubbing brushes, namely, kitchen scrubbing brushes; kitchen utensil crocks; ladles for kitchen use; non-electric whisks for household purposes, namely, manual whisks; meat tongs; mixing spoons; non-electric whisks for household purposes; pasta serving scoops; pie servers; salad serving utensils, namely, serving spoons, serving forks, and serving tongs; salad tongs; serving forks; serving spoons; serving tongs; household utensils, namely, skimmers for kitchen use; slotted spoons; spaghetti tongs; spatulas for kitchen use; household utensils, namely, turners being kitchen utensils; vegetable mashers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |