Drawing for DAMN GOOD MARKETING PODCAST

USPTO serial 98488786

DAMN GOOD MARKETING PODCAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAMN GOOD MARKETING PODCAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca Saucier

Rebecca Saucier Arena Law Firm, LLC442 Fremaux AvenueSlidell, LA 70458United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing podcasts in the field of marketing; Production of podcastsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 24, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 24, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 23, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 23, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 22, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 22, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance