USPTO serial 98503075
MAHATMA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 748
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AVENT, TEAGUE A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAHATMA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu
Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu BAYRAMOGLU LAW OFFICES LLC1540 WEST WARM SPRINGS ROAD SUITE 100HENDERSON, NV 89014United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Levelers being machines, namely, rolling leveling machines in the nature of metal working machines; Precision machine tools for machining materials, namely, precision machine tool for machining metal in the nature of metal working machines; precision machine tools for machining metal, namely, machining centers; Machines for shaping plastic material; Precision servo feeder, namely, feeders for machines for automatic feeding of plate material, feeders for machines for automatic feeding of roll material, the foregoing in the nature of conveyor belts; feeding machines, namely, machines for automatic loading and feeding bars into single spindle or multi-spindle machines, the foregoing in the nature of conveyor belts; Sheet metal processing machines; Feeders for machines, namely, feeders for machines for automatic feeding of plate material, feeders for machines for automatic feeding of roll material, the foregoing in the nature of conveyor belts; feeding machines, namely, machines for automatic loading and feeding bars into singlespindle or multispindle machines, the foregoing in the nature of conveyor belts; Automatic loading and unloading manipulator, namely, feeders for machines for automatic feeding of plate material, feeders for machines for automatic feeding of roll material, the foregoing in the nature of conveyor belts; feeding machines, namely, machines for automatic loading and feeding bars into singlespindle or multispindle machines, the foregoing in the nature of conveyor belts; Sheet metal CNC precision machining machine, namely, rolling leveling machines being metal working machines; Laser welding machines; Servo CNC highprecision leveling machine, namely, rolling leveling machines being metal working machines; Metal leveling processing equipment, namely, rolling leveling machines being metal working machines | ACTIVE | Nov 27, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 7, 2025 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2025 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2025 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2025 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |