Drawing for PROACT

USPTO serial 98504796

PROACT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BARANDAO, CHERISE DESIRIMA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROACT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher M. Kindel

Christopher M. Kindel Pirkey Barber PLLC1801 East 6th Street, Suite 300Austin, TX 78702United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009downloadable software for project management, workflow management, managing service contracts, managing service requests, tracking status of service requests for the oil and gas industry; downloadable software for data collection and management for the oil and gas industry; Downloadable computer software for providing information, advice, and remote support in the oil and gas industry; downloadable software for collecting and analyzing data for the purposes of improving operational efficiency and sustainability for the oil and gas industryACTIVE—
042Providing online non-downloadable software, software as a service (SaaS) services, and platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring software for project management, workflow management, managing service contracts, managing service requests, tracking status of service requests for the oil and gas industry; providing online non-downloadable software, software as a service (SaaS) services, and platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring software for data collection and management for the oil and gas industry; providing online non-downloadable software, software as a service (SaaS) services, and platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring computer software for providing information, advice, and remote support in the oil and gas industry; providing online non-downloadable software, software as a service (SaaS) services, and platform as a service (PaaS) services featuring software for collecting and analyzing data for the purposes of improving operational efficiency and sustainability for the oil and gas industryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 11, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 30, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 29, 2025GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2025GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2025CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 27, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2025TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2024GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2024GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2024CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2024NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2024TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Jul 15, 2024PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2024NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance