USPTO serial 98506914
C3 AI ELM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, LESLEE ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with C3 AI ELM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redwood City, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kelley B. Harrington
Kelley B. Harrington Cooley LLP1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700ATTN: IP Docketing DepartmentWashington, DC 20004-2400Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for use in the collection, transmission, integration, visualization, analysis and storage of data | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business consulting and information services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in the design, development and deployment of computer software, big data and IOT enterprise-scale applications; Platform as a service (PAAS) services featuring software platforms for use in the design, development and deployment of computer software, big data and IOT enterprise-scale applications; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in the collection, transmission, integration, visualization, analysis and storage of data; Platform as a service (PAAS) services featuring software platforms for use in the collection, transmission, integration, visualization, analysis and storage of data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 22, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 22, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |