USPTO serial 98511793
CLOUD INGENUITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLOUD INGENUITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dane Butzer
5856 Ainsley Ave.Columbus, OH 43230United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer network security consultancy; Computer programming consultancy; Computer programming consultancy in the field of physical, virtual, and cloud computing; Computer security consultancy; Computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; Computer security consultancy in the field of physical, virtual, and cloud computing; Computer software consultancy; Computer software consultation; Computer software consulting; Computer technology consultancy; Computer technology consultancy in the field of physical, virtual, and cloud computing; Consultation about the maintenance and updating of computer software; Consultation services relating to computer software; Consulting in the field of configuration management for computer hardware and software; Consulting services for others in the field of design, planning, and implementation project management of physical, virtual, and cloud computing; Consulting services in the design and implementation of computer-based information systems for businesses; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the field of hosting computer software applications; Consulting services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Information technology consultancy relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Information technology consulting relating to computer software design; IT consulting services relating to installation, maintenance and repair of computer software; Technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services; Technological consultation in the technology field of physical, virtual, and cloud computing; Technological planning and consulting services in the field of physical, virtual, and cloud computing | ACTIVE | May 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2024 | LOPE | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE REVIEWED - ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2024 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |