USPTO serial 98515731
FULCRUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURKE, KELLY CHRISTINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FULCRUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Petersburg, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexandra Haller
Alexandra Haller Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP1450 Brickell Ave Fl 23Miami, FL 33131United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for providing an online and offline database in the field of transaction processing to upload transactional data, provide statistical analysis, produce notifications and reports, and for the management and monitoring of geographic and spatial data; Downloadable computer software for automation of data warehousing; Downloadable software, capable of functioning offline, for field data collection and process management with and without mapping and location data; Downloadable geographic information system (GIS) software to monitor physical assets in utility infrastructure across energy, water, and environmental industries; Downloadable computer software that provides real-time, integrated business management intelligence by combining information from various databases and presenting it in an easy-to-understand user interface; Downloadable software for organizations to build and maintain assets in the field by receiving data and information in real time from a SaaS platform, with advanced GIS features such as geocoding, spatial analysis, real-time calculations, and custom map layers for location-based insights. | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 12, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2024 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |