USPTO serial 98517238
DENTICARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAVIS, TRENTON MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENTICARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
Jess M. Collen Practus, LLP100 South Bedford Road, Suite 328THE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGMount Kisco, NY 10549Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Anti-cavity dental preventatives, namely prophylaxis paste with fluoride; Anti-cavity dental coating preparations containing neutral sodium fluoride gel; Medicated dental rinses containing chlorhexidine gluconate; Anti-cavity dental coating preparations containing topical sodium fluoride foam; Medicated dental rinses containing neutral sodium fluoride; oral cleaning aids for both professional dental use, namely, anti-cavity fluoride gels and foams for use by dentists; Oral dental varnish for use by dentists; topical anesthetic gels and ointment; Anti-cavity dental preparations in the nature of prophylaxis paste with fluoride; pre-filled dental trays for applying dental compositions to teeth. | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Dental bite trays; Dental instruments, namely, prohy angles and saliva ejectors being parts of oral irrigators | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2024 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Dec 12, 2024 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |