USPTO serial 98521344
AI-NATIVE PLATFORM FOR HUMAN BEHAVIOR SECURITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 660Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURKE, KELLY CHRISTINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with AI-NATIVE PLATFORM FOR HUMAN BEHAVIOR SECURITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV, US
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Kim
John M. Kim IPLA, LLP4445 Eastgate MallSuite 200San Diego, CA 92121Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable software that utilizes machine learning in the field of cybersecurity for restricting unauthorized access to computer systems and computer programs; Providing online non-downloadable software that utilizes machine learning to determine the normal communication behavior of individuals to identify unusual communication behavior; Computer services for analyzing digital activities to discover security threats; Computer services for analyzing digital communications occurring across email and messaging platforms to discover security threats; Computer security services, namely, online scanning, detecting, quarantining, and eliminating of viruses, worms, trojans, spyware, adware, malware, social engineering based instructions and exploits, and unauthorized data and programs from digital communications including emails and messages; Computer security services, namely, remediating instances of account takeover by restricting unauthorized access to accounts for email and messaging management services; Computer security services, namely, monitoring of computer systems to detect instances of account takeover; Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for the analysis and protection of digital activities, communications, and accounts; Platform as a service (PaaS) featuring software-implemented platforms for the analysis and protection of digital activities, communications, and accounts; Email and messaging management services for others, namely, threat protection in the nature of monitoring computing systems to detect unauthorized access, data breach, and data exfiltration and storing digital communications recorded in electronic media; Software as a service (SaaS) featuring software for the analysis and protection of the security of network communications, cybersecurity, email management virus protection, email archiving, email continuity, and email security; Computer security consultancy; Computer security services for evaluating emails to identify fraudulent individuals and entities, such as vendors, and then monitoring the computer systems of those fraudulent individuals and entities on an ongoing basis to detect fraud; Computer services for recording behaviors of individuals and entities deemed to be fraudulent in a blacklist for security purposes, namely, identifying and examining digital communications involving individuals and entities to identify security threats; Computer services for tracking digital activities of individuals and entities determined to be fraudulent based on an analysis of emails sent by those individuals and entities, namely, monitoring digital communications involving individuals and entities determined to be fraudulent to identify security threats; Computer services for generating a federated collection of individuals and entities to prevent security threats, namely, online of digital communications in computer systems for threat prevention and for identifying and cataloging individuals' and entities' behaviors to prevent fraud | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2026 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 3, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2026 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2025 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2025 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 24, 2025 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2025 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2025 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2025 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |