USPTO serial 98524909
FAST PLAY BY INTRALOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAPLAN, VALERIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAST PLAY BY INTRALOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Duluth, GA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH R HAUPT
KEITH R HAUPT Wood, Herron & Evans LLPsuite 2800600 Vine StCincinnati, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer game software for gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals; Electronic terminal for an electronic lottery system which generates lottery tickets | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Gaming machines for gambling including slot machines or video lottery terminals; Gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals; Lottery tickets; Reconfigurable casino and lottery gaming equipment, namely, gaming machines and recorded operational computer game software therefor sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Administration of lotteries for others; Conducting lotteries for others; Lottery services; Lottery services provided over a global computer network; Operating lotteries; Organization of lotteries; On-line lottery services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2024 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Apr 29, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |