USPTO serial 98526123
PETLIBRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PETLIBRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cameras for monitoring pets; Computer monitors; Downloadable computer software applications for remote control of automatic pet feeders and drinking bowls and monitoring pet's feeding and drinking; Electronic animal identification apparatus; Electronic collars to train animals; Global positioning system (GPS) apparatus; Recorded computer programs for remote control of automatic pet feeders and drinking bowls and monitoring pet's feeding and drinking; Security surveillance robots; Video monitors | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design; Development of computer platforms; Industrial design; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for remote control of automatic pet feeders and drinking bowls and monitoring pet's feeding and drinking; Research and development of new products for others; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for remote control of automatic pet feeders and drinking bowls and monitoring pet's feeding and drinking; Updating of smartphone software; User authentication services using single sign-on technology for online software applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Animal breeding; Beauty salon services; Dietary and nutritional guidance; Health assessment services; Medical clinic services; Medical services in the nature of administering vaccines; Pet grooming; Remote monitoring of medical data for medical diagnosis and treatment; Rental of sanitary installations; Veterinary services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 6, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 5, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2025 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2024 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |